snap vertices onto each other

[samifox]

hi

i need a lisp to snap vertices onto each other. 

 

if you have a long line that consist of lots of segment and not all segments are perfectly snapped to each other ased on proximity and distance.

 

there must be a lisp someone wrote for this.

 

 

any idea?

[Abrasive]

@Lee Mac  Wrote a "Chain Select" routine that works really well.

 

https://www.lee-mac.com/chainsel.html

 

I believe you could modify Line 29 to a different tolerance if needed.

.... (setq fz 1e-8) ;; Point comparison tolerance"

[samifox]

I've adjusted the FZ to 3 and ensured that the lines aren't spaced more than that. However, it didn't yield the desired outcome. Additionally, even if it does work, shouldn't it align ? not just select??"

[Abrasive]

I did forget to mention I added to the routine after line 121:

 

... (command "._PEDIT" "_M" s2 "" "_Y" "_J" "" "")

 

Not sure if that routine will work with such a large gap.

It's also not meant to align segments but to select and then connect.

 

[BIGAL]

Been discussed a few times joining miscloses.

 

Did you google ? "snap vertices onto each other autocad lisp"

 

Pretty sure over at Forums/autodesk there is an answer.

[Jonathan Handojo]

I do have something. However, this doesn't technically "move" the line, it simply extends and trims the line to meet at the intersections. Just don't enter a tolerance too big.

 

After you run this command, then you can join them (or even confirm using the forementioned Chain Selection program by Lee-Mac.

 

In the attached I tried NEATX for fun, but the result turned out ugly as hell. So I just recommend NEAT instead and then you specify the tolerance... of probably 5 to 10, if your objects aren't too far. I can't really guarantee that this will work to your expectation, but hopefully it should.

Neaten.lsp

Edited April 21 by Jonathan Handojo

[BIGAL]

Had a quick look and I think Kent Coopers suggestion was best that you move both ends to the midpoint of the 2 ends that are not touching. 

 

What quantities are we talking about in other post a figure of 70,000 was suggested at this level the lisp may crash as the list gets to big of end values.

 

Did you try the pedit solution ?