Sengna Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 I just wondering how people caculate this so i understand better, ex: drawing scale 1/4"=1' for 1/8" plotted text height how did we get 6? Thanks Quote
Dana W Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 That's a really good reason to use annotative text, a really good one. Quote
Sengna Posted January 22, 2015 Author Posted January 22, 2015 easy 48*1/8 =6 48*3/16=9 sorry for very stupid question, i got it now,....thanks Quote
Sengna Posted January 22, 2015 Author Posted January 22, 2015 That's a really good reason to use annotative text, a really good one. yes Dana W, that is another option to do. Thanks Quote
steven-g Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 It's an even better reason to accept fate, and go metric .>) or add text and dims in your layout's Quote
Dana W Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 (edited) It's an even better reason to accept fate, and go metric .>) or add text and dims in your layout'sHey, it's your fault we're Imperial in the first place. And, I am the master of my fate, and I will not accept it, after having gotten a good look at it. Edited January 22, 2015 by Dana W Quote
ReMark Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 I just wondering how people caculate this so i understand better, ex: drawing scale 1/4"=1' for 1/8" plotted text height how did we get 6? Thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]52479[/ATTACH] Begs the question why you would even be using a method that by in large is obsolete? It's even too old school for me and I am the definition of old school. You should either be using annotative scaling if your text and dimensions are in model space or putting both of those entities in your layout. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.