arunz Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Dear all, my system was very slow when i opened 2 more drawings in same time using Autocad 2014 LT.. but if i am working in single drawing to open it was fast... what is the problem it? Quote
ReMark Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 What are your system specs? What is the drawing file size for each of the drawings? What else is running in the background? Are xrefs being used? Are layer filters being used? Quote
arunz Posted April 9, 2014 Author Posted April 9, 2014 the drawings file size were 4.67mb and 8.76mb when i opend work in two drawings i got that problem if i close one to work the system was fast ...but its not a Xref drawing normal .. Quote
ReMark Posted April 9, 2014 Posted April 9, 2014 What OS are you running? What else is running in the background? MS Office? Antivirus? Browser? How is it that you have 8GB of RAM but only 3.39GB is usable? My gut feeling is it's a combination of inadequate of amount of RAM and large file size. What do you have for a graphics card or is does the system utilize an onboard graphics chip? Quote
RobDraw Posted April 9, 2014 Posted April 9, 2014 If I remember right 32 bit OS could only use 4G RAM, that might explain the low usable number. I can't help but notice that big ol' 1.0 for the Windows Experience. Something is wrong or needs serious updating. Quote
pendean Posted April 20, 2014 Posted April 20, 2014 32bit Windows, all versions, can only use 3Gig of RAM: but that shouldn't act as you describe: is this a new problem? Did something change recently on the PC? Quote
ReMark Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 (edited) Putting 8GB of RAM in a 32-bit system would actually slow the computer to a crawl. While one can put 4GB of RAM in a 32-bit system normally the system will only address about 80% of it and that's with the 3/GB switch enabled in the boot.ini file. One member here will tell you it is possible to go beyond that limit but given what the user has to do to achieve that goal it isn't worth the trouble as most would find the process too technical. Edited April 21, 2014 by ReMark Quote
SLW210 Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 I use many files much larger than those on a 32-Bit Windows. I would guess graphics card or other computer/network problems. Like RobDraw stated, I would look into the 1.0 Windows experience for a start. How does 8GB of RAM slow a 32-bit system to a crawl, just curious? Quote
SLW210 Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 32bit Windows, all versions, can only use 3Gig of RAM: but that shouldn't act as you describe: is this a new problem? Did something change recently on the PC? That is flat out false. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_server_2003_r2 Just for one example. Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Limit on X86 64 GB Quote
ReMark Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 I think the problem of too much RAM actually slowing down a computer was prevalent in older versions of Windows like Win95, 98 and ME. Microsoft even had a knowledge base article on the subject. And there was one Award BIOS that had a problem until a BIOS update was released. Can't recall which one that was though. It still begs the question though, why would anyone put 8GB of RAM in a 32-bit system? Money to burn? Quote
f700es Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 Yeah but Server versions aren't really the same as desktop versions, iirc. I think we are about to argue over "semantics". I think it's best to say that only 64bit desktop systems can address "more" than 4gb of ram. From the PAE area on MSDN.....link "Certain 32-bit versions of Windows Server running on x86-based systems can use PAE to access up to 64 GB or 128 GB of physical memory, depending on the physical address size of the processor. For details, see Memory Limits for Windows Releases." Sounds like other variables come into play as well. Quote
f700es Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 I think the problem of too much RAM actually slowing down a computer was prevalent in older versions of Windows like Win95, 98 and ME. Microsoft even had a knowledge base article on the subject. And there was one Award BIOS that had a problem until a BIOS update was released. Can't recall which one that was though. Sure if the machine still use BIOS (and not UEFI) then this might be worth looking at for sure. I do agree that 1.0 Windows rating has me confused as well. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.