PotGuy Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I've been looking around the Columns tab for a means to create a 47.3mm Dia. tube, but have no luck so far. Edit Type and exploring that area brought no joy. Anyone got suggestions? Quote
tzframpton Posted June 18, 2013 Posted June 18, 2013 I wouldn't use columns. I'd just use a Line Based Generic Family to start with, and use a Profile for the tube dimensions. What Family where you trying to edit the Type on? Quote
PotGuy Posted July 1, 2013 Author Posted July 1, 2013 Currently attempting it under the CHS family. Made a 650 Dia concrete pile under that family already. Quote
tzframpton Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 What is a "CHS Family"? Never heard of that. Quote
tzframpton Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 Perhaps Circular Hollow SectionThat may be true, but there's not Circular Hollow Section Family in Revit. This is why I'm very confused, lol.... Quote
tzframpton Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 May be a company specific set up.That's impossible. Revit has finite Family Categories. Can you post a screen shot? Quote
PotGuy Posted July 2, 2013 Author Posted July 2, 2013 I cannot at the moment, but when I get to work I'll put something up at lunch. Maybe it's just me being absolutely dumb. Quote
PotGuy Posted July 4, 2013 Author Posted July 4, 2013 Got a PS. Revit Structure 2012. You can see my 'custom' Concrete Pile Quote
tzframpton Posted July 4, 2013 Posted July 4, 2013 Ah.... sorry for the confusion. I was referring to a Family Category not a Loadable Family like you were stating. My apologies on that one. How is it working out for you? FWIW, you'll have to load the same Loadable Family for Column, Beam, Brace Families, etc to make your life easier. All the different types of structural members act differently. Quote
PotGuy Posted July 4, 2013 Author Posted July 4, 2013 It's getting better; I've been learning really how to use the controls to create custom items such as the scaffold tube. All practise I do is during downtime. Apologies for not being clear; still get the terms wrong when describing Revit. While AutoCAD is easier to use IMO Revit is more advanced and specialised in what it does. Quote
tzframpton Posted July 4, 2013 Posted July 4, 2013 Revit is definitely an advanced program. The reason why AutoCAD is so simple is because it's a general drafting program. With Revit you design with purpose. But Revit can be very simple too, even more simple than AtuoCAD at times. Just depends on what you're using it for. Quote
PotGuy Posted July 4, 2013 Author Posted July 4, 2013 I think there was a thread with this discussion...? Quote
tzframpton Posted July 4, 2013 Posted July 4, 2013 I think there was a thread with this discussion...?Multiple discussions. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.