Dimensions at Layout tab

[m2double]

Is it possible to make the dimmentions (drawn in the layout tab) to follow the object (drawn in the model space) when it is moved?

 

 

[MSasu]

Seems that you placed the dimensions on PaperSpace. Sorry, but this is wrong!. Should activate that viewport and add the dimensions in ModelSpace trough PaperSpace. Don't forget to check the option: Dimension Style -> Fit -> Scale dimensions to layout.

 

A work-around for your current case is to use the command CHSPACE.

 

Regards,

Mircea

[ReMark]

Dimensioning in a layout is not wrong, it's just another option available to AutoCAD users. I've used this method for several years with no problems what-so-ever.

[RobDraw]

Then maybe you can help the OP...

[MSasu]

If the OP decide to add the dimensions in PS (a method that I, personally, don't like at all, but may produce a good drawing as ReMark stated) then he/she must ensure that when try to move a viewport, he/she select all corresponding dimensions.

 

Regards,

Mircea

[MSasu]

A theoretical solution is to create one block from each viewport and the corresponding dimensions – not sure how practical this will be in “real life”.

 

Regards,

Mircea

[ReMark]

CAD Blog.net

 

Creating Dimensions in Model Space and Paper Space.

 

"If you draw a dimension in a layout that describes geometry in your model, the layout dimension does not change when you use editing commands or change the magnification of the display in the model space viewport. The location of the layout dimensions also stays the same when you change a view from a layout to model space."

[ReMark]

If the OP decide to add the dimensions in PS (a method that I, personally, don't like at all, but may produce a good drawing as ReMark stated) then he/she must ensure that when try to move a viewport, he/she select all corresponding dimensions.

 

Regards,

Mircea

 

If I were working in the civil or architectural field I would most certainly use Annotative Scaling when it comes to dimensioning. I have tried the method and can definitely see where it might have some advantages over dimensioning in paper space. I happen to find the fact that I do not have to deal with annotative scaling variables and scalelists very conducive to the type of work I do. I am not suggesting that annotative scaling is wrong or that it should not be used. It is just another option the CAD user has at his/her disposal and each individual or company should choose the method they want to use based upon their particular needs.

[RobDraw]

Is it possible to make the dimmentions (drawn in the layout tab) to follow the object (drawn in the model space) when it is moved?

QUOTE]

 

I could not test in 2008 but if the dimensions are associative, they will move along with the object(s) when moved.

 

See what I did there guys. I did not criticise or offer alternative methods. I found out that it is possible to do what the OP asked. I don't even use dimensions and I answered the question at hand. Is that so hard?

[ReMark]

Is it possible to make the dimmentions (drawn in the layout tab) to follow the object (drawn in the model space) when it is moved?

QUOTE]

 

I could not test in 2008 but if the dimensions are associative, they will move along with the object(s) when moved.

 

See what I did there guys. I did not criticise or offer alternative methods. I found out that it is possible to do what the OP asked. I don't even use dimensions and I answered the question at hand. Is that so hard?

 

And we're so glad you did we can hardly contain our mirth. Thank you.

 

Actually, I posted the answer then deleted the post. The question has been asked and answered so many times I figured the OP would eventually find it on his own.

 

The credit for answering the question is all yours. Enjoy.

[Pablo Ferral]

So the answer is yes - but it's really flaky. However - as you have a 3D object there, it is really the only way to dimension the object. You might look into 'SOLDRAW' and 'SOLPROF' or 'FLATSHOT' to create 2D blocks of your 3D model which can then be dimensioned in model space.

 

Or you could upgrade to 2012 which has new 3D model documentation tools which work like Inventor.

[SLW210]

If you use NODE and or Apparent Intersection (and after moving, remove the relationship) for the OSNAP or SNAP to another dimension on associative dimensions, they will not work. Read through AutoCAD Help on Associative Dimensions there are some other limitations.

[SLW210]

I will probably revert back to dimensions in paper space myself.

 

Different strokes for different folks. IMHO, on many occasions for me it is neater, quicker and more appealing to the eye to use paper space for dimensions.

[ReMark]

I make it a habit not to dimension 3D objects. I use them primary as pretty pictures to supplement the 2D fabrication details (created in any number of ways) derived from the 3D geometry.

[m2double]

Thanks everyone, I think Associative Dimensions is good this time - motivation was to have dimention that doesn't change the size depending on object scale in the Paperspace.