glass drawing

[Shardanand]

hi

 

i want to create drawing with glass in autocad 2008 as shown in image,

from outside inside thing should be seen.

 

regards

 

[Patrick Hughes]

You will need to create a 3D model using solid objects. After you have done that you will apply materials to the windows and such, then perform a render with certain lighting and cameras and viewing angles as required.

 

A daunting task if you've not done this before.

[ReMark]

AutoCAD does include glass as one of its standard materials.

[Cad64]

There isn't a real clear question here. Just saying "This is what I want to do" doesn't really tell us what you need help with. Do you need help with creating a model? Or working with materials? Or setting up your render? Ask specific questions and you will surely get the answers you require.

[Shardanand]

You will need to create a 3D model using solid objects. After you have done that you will apply materials to the windows and such, then perform a render with certain lighting and cameras and viewing angles as required.

 

A daunting task if you've not done this before.

 

 

thanks

 

i know to make solid's

 

can u provide me step's for the same

 

thanks in advance

[ReMark]

Materials can be applied either to individual objects or to layers. I suggest you assign your materials to layers. So you might have a layer called "glass" and another one called "brick", etc.

[roof11]

@ReMark, so when you applied your material into an object you should know where it is. example instead of writing Floor in a Layername , you put a Tiles in that layername. is that so sir?

[ReMark]

I would think that the more specific one is the better off he/she will be. The layer name "floor" is fairly generic and the user may have more than one type of floor covering. It could be wood, tile, vinyl, carpet, or other. Your suggestion to have a layer named "Tiles" does make a lot of sense.

[roof11]

yes you are correct sir , sorry.. so when i named the layer i should know where i applied, is that so?

[ReMark]

It makes the most sense to me. Why name a layer then have to guess what it applies to?