JD Mather Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 (edited) ....but wait!! Your part can only be square... So here is another example. Notice in this part I used the sketch for the loft rather than the part face. I consider this to be a more robust technique. Also consider whether you should thicken towards the inside or the outside - how does the piece interact with mating parts. Frequently the sheet metal is going around something of known dimensions so you use those dimensions and thicken towards the outside. Don't forget to make allowances for manufacturing tolerances - we can't make exact parts. Tray 2.zip Edited December 17, 2010 by JD Mather Quote
JD Mather Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 thicken instead of a shell. Is there a reason for this? Thicken always returns side cuts perpendicular to face in flat pattern. The same cannot always be said for Shell (not to say that Shell should never be used for sheet metal). Quote
Hopinc Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 Sodapop808, you have piqued my curiosity with this part - what is it's function in life? Dave Quote
sodapop808 Posted December 17, 2010 Posted December 17, 2010 I work for a company that makes cladding for architectural features... This will be a panel that has the "look" that the architect is going for. We typically make flat panels, which for our current needs, only requires autocad to stretch height and length. We would really like to start making stuff like this that is outside the box, which is why I am trying to learn as much as possible with Inventor. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.