CADmonkey4228 Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 Currently working on some as-builts. Wondering if there is any program that will import gps coordinates from my handheld device and place them onto google maps images and then import that image with those gps waypoint into autocad. Thanks in advance Quote
Tuns Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 What is "as built"? I've never heard of that before. As for the GPS to AutoCAD, I have no idea if something like that exists. You can try some sort of work around like importing a map into AutoCAD or something. Maybe someone else knows of a program that does it. Quote
CADmonkey4228 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Posted November 8, 2013 As-built meaning what has actually been installed compared to what was originally designed on our plan. For example, when an irrigation mainline is supposed to be placed 5 ft from a sidewalk and then for whatever reason ends up being placed 3 ft from said sidewalk. Basically I am trying to see if it is possible to take a handheld gps device out onto a project after it has been installed and place waypoints over valve boxes, sprinkler heads, and other landscape elements and then transfer these onto a calibrated basemap to get accurate placement of these different elements. Rather then going out with pen, paper, scale, and trying to best estimate and locate this elements on a plan. I have found a program called GPS2CAD, but am having a hard time with the demo version and don't want to buy the full on version before I can test out all the bugs..... Quote
eldon Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 What is the accuracy of hand held GPS now? It used to be +/- 5m at best. I don't think you could distinguish down to 2ft. You might be more accurate with a tape measure. Quote
Tuns Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 If you have the original, can't you check the field dimensions based on the original? Just note the differences and draw them out. That's if the GPS isn't accurate enough that is. Quote
CADmonkey4228 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Posted November 8, 2013 Yes we have originals, again it just comes back to finding a more efficient way of plotting points onto a plan by pulling those off the gps and having them dropped right onto plan through google images or maps and then inserting that drawing with points onto cad. But when it comes to accuracy of the gps device and google maps or earth is where we run into problems. If I could go out and plot a waypoint for a valve box on site and be within 5 ft, then be able to transfer this onto cad, itd be faster, easier to plot out an entire site rather then measuring off of building corners or existing elements to get locations for heads, valves, walls. Quote
CADmonkey4228 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Posted November 8, 2013 If you have the original, can't you check the field dimensions based on the original? Just note the differences and draw them out. That's if the GPS isn't accurate enough that is. Yes this is our current system, trying to move away from it Quote
Tuns Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 Honestly, I'd trust measuring them myself over using a GPS to do it. It may take longer and be "boring" but it is the right way to do it. Quote
Murph_map Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 First off what type of GPS unit are you using and what format does it export to? Second if you're using AutoCAD LT you are limited on most methods to do this. Most add-ons are either lisp or VB apps that can read the gps data. Getting the points from the GPS to Google earth is easy if it's the sport grade unit. There are a few free programs out there for that. Search GPS waypoints into Google Earth or KMZ files. Last even when you get the points on GE there's no easy way (free) to get that over to AutoCAD dwg anymore. There used to be an app for Full AutoCAD that did it but now Google wants money for it. Have you looked at AutoCAD Map3D? That's the program for doing this type of work. Quote
Organic Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 I wouldn't think a handheld GPS won't be accurate enough. You would need a surveyors GPS system (not cheap) to get any real accuracy. Although given you are using Google Maps this may be overkill for your application given the resolution of the images typically available. E.g. in Google maps will you even be able to tell the difference between a point 0ft or 2ft from where it should be? Quote
Ankarsvik Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) Hi, I wrote this 8 yrs ago. It was at the time when OziExplorer was #1 software for creating maps. Nowadays I use something else.. Anyway, It's quite straight forward. Unzip and put lsp and dcl file in appropriate search dir. Usage: type "Geo" to use. Load attached file, bullervall.log (bullervall.log is a NMEA-stream) Zoom extents and you will find an polyline positioned in Swedish grid. Add the other *.plt file and you will find a track over some 16 km. Note: Not all functions are not implemented. geoCalc.zip Edited December 11, 2013 by Ankarsvik Quote
Tuns Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 This is an LT forum. LISP wont work for LT. Quote
ReMark Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Don't abandon all hope. The OP could download BabaCAD and its lisp extension. BabaCAD could open the drawing (if saved to 2007 file format) and maybe the GeoCalc lisp would work. Can't say for sure since I don't use BabaCAD. Quote
Tuns Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I've never heard of BabablacksheepCAD. How does it work? Quote
ReMark Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 The developer just posted recently about BabaCAD and the fact that it is the only free CAD program to incorporate the use of lisp. He did admit to having further programming to do. Read all about it here.... http://www.babacad.com/index.html Quote
Organic Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I tried BabCad a while back and most lisp routines I had wouldn't work (presumeably because they used commands not yet programmed into BabaCad). Quote
Tuns Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Yeah, I just tried it and there is a large number of commands missing. I'm sure it will get better but it's fairly primitive still. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.