Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/19/2019 in all areas

  1. No problems. I am of the opinion that everyone should have a choice. Who understands Lisp - can use it. Who does not understand Lisp or needs a convenient interface - use the program. But users need to understand - if they want improvements, they want very big requirements, then it takes a lot of time, and then it will be for an additional fee.
    1 point
  2. I may be wrong but I think you can do it using dim and base command. Not a dim style that I use very often.
    1 point
  3. may this lsp will help you long_section_3dp.lsp
    1 point
  4. Started to play with dims and the obvious is that a point number must be added, to what ever is picked. This is common for me a road set out plan. Yeah still not sure why ? Thinking more there is do object code out there so why bother with dims just do. pline1, len1 pline1, len2 pline1, len3 pline2, len1 pline2, len2
    1 point
  5. I checked your drawing and although it looks like the splines are snapped together and at the same elevation, apparently they are not. I grabbed one of the splines by the endpoint and snapped it to the other spline. Then I ran the JOIN command and they became one. Give it a try.
    1 point
  6. If you want the actual height of the text in the drawing use the TEXTBOX function. A string with the same height like "1234" will not be the same physical height as "{1234,". Try it (if (setq e (car (entsel "\nPick text: "))) (print (abs (apply '- (mapcar 'cadr (textbox (entget e)))))) )
    1 point
  7. (defun average ( lst ) (mapcar '(lambda ( x ) (/ x (length lst))) (apply 'mapcar (cons '+ lst))) ) (average '((0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0) (1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0) (2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0) (3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0))) ;; => (1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5)
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...